10 tips for replying to reviewers’ comments on your manuscript
Dr Babak Taheri is an Associate Professor in Marketing and Programmes Director in MSc...
Read Moreby Guest Writer | May 3, 2017 | Getting Published, The final years | 0 |
Dr Babak Taheri is an Associate Professor in Marketing and Programmes Director in MSc...
Read Moreby Kevin O'Gorman | Feb 20, 2017 | Getting Published, Life after PhD, Research, The final years | 0 |
Kevin O’Gorman trained in Glasgow, Salamanca and Rome as a philosopher, theologian and historian....
Read Moreby Guest Writer | Aug 23, 2016 | Getting Published, Postgraduates, Research tools, Stuck in the middle, The early years, Undergraduates | 0 |
Are you at that stage in your dissertation or research project where you are considering using mixed-methods? Here are ten hints on how to conduct mixed methods research.
Read Moreby Guest Writer | May 8, 2016 | Academic Conference, Getting Published, Life after PhD, The final years | 0 |
As a junior academic researcher, the issue of ‘innovativeness’ in academic research has been a continual cause of anxiety and doubt: is it wise for a Junior Scholar to be innovative?
Read Moreby Guest Writer | Mar 27, 2016 | Getting Published, Postgraduates, Research tools, Stuck in the middle, The final years | 0 |
Are you struggling to put together your conceptual framework? Dr Babak Taheri gives you 10 tips on developing a conceptual framework in quantitative studies.
Read Moreby Guest Writer | Feb 14, 2016 | Getting Published, Postgraduates, The final years, Undergraduates | 0 |
Dr Babak Taheri gives 9 + 1 hints for publishing a quantitative journal paper.
Read Moreby Kevin O'Gorman | Feb 11, 2016 | Getting Published, Life after PhD, THE Blog, The final years | 0 |
Now, before we go any further, clearly articulating you theory, context, data collection, and data analysis is not enough to get published, however, not doing is enough to get your paper desk rejected.
Clear articulation of all three things is subject to a sensible selection process; a general review might not require the application of any particular theory, whilst a conceptual paper may not involve the collection and analysis of original data, but once you know what type of paper you are writing, you should be able to break it down. Being able to explain your paper in relation to each of these sections is of great help when considering both the ways in which to frame the paper, and the gaps that your research addresses.
Read Moreby Kevin O'Gorman | Feb 7, 2016 | Getting Published, Stuck in the middle, THE Blog, The final years | 0 |
Prof. Kevin O’gorman gives his top 10 hints on how to get published for the first time. It is way more accessible than you actually think.
Read Moreby Norin Arshed | Jan 26, 2016 | Getting Published, Life after PhD | 0 |
Recently, I had a journal article published in the International Journal and Management Reviews titled “Expanding the Domain of Festival Research: A Review and Research Agenda”. The paper undertook a systematic literature review whereby myself and my co-authors recognised the critical role festival founder’s (entrepreneurs) play in the initiation and continuance of festivals and the importance of the wider networks in which festivals are locally embedded.
Read Moreby Kevin O'Gorman | Jan 13, 2016 | Getting Published, The final years | 0 |
In an ideal world your paper should be aiming to fill the following four gaps: Theoretical Gap, Methodological Gap, Contextual Gap and Management Practice Gap.
Read More